Pay in installments of $7.43 with
,
and
Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Nov 1 - Nov 6
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
moonshine snake plant wrinkled leaves MoonshineDracaena (Sansevieria) trifasciata 'Moonshine' Dracaena trifasciata 'Moonshine' is a light toned snake plant with broad, upright leaves and a soft grey green surface. The leaves rise from the base in firm, lance shaped fans, with faint horizontal markings and a narrow darker edge. Its colour gives the plant a calm appearance while keeping the strong structure of a snake plant. This cultivar has light grey green foliage on firm vertical leaves. The
Dracaena (Sansevieria) trifasciata 'Moonshine'
Dracaena trifasciata 'Moonshine' is a light-toned snake plant with broad, upright leaves and a soft grey-green surface. The leaves rise from the base in firm, lance-shaped fans, with faint horizontal markings and a narrow darker edge. Its colour gives the plant a calm appearance while keeping the strong structure of a snake plant.
This cultivar has light grey-green foliage on firm vertical leaves. The smooth surface catches light in simple pots, while growth comes from a rhizome below the substrate. New leaves appear from the base and slowly increase the density of the clump.
Light leaves with a fine green edge
- Leaf colour: Light grey-green blades give the plant a cool, bright look.
- Leaf edge: A fine dark green margin outlines the leaves and sharpens the light-toned foliage.
- Growth base: New leaves rise from the rhizome and slowly fill the pot.
- Indoor shape: Upright, lance-shaped leaves give height from a compact base.
- Flowering: Mature plants may occasionally produce pale, fragrant flower spikes in settled indoor conditions.
How Moonshine grows in a pot
Dracaena trifasciata is native from southern Nigeria to western Central Tropical Africa and Tanzania, where it grows in seasonally dry tropical conditions. Its firm leaves store water, while the rhizome needs a clear drying phase between waterings. Air around the rhizome is especially important after watering in cooler indoor conditions.
'Moonshine' keeps the firm sword-leaf form of the species, while the light foliage makes dust, splash marks and handling damage easier to notice. New leaves may emerge very light and then settle into a cooler grey-green tone as they mature. In bright indirect light, the leaves usually stay firm and evenly coloured.
The plant usually grows slowly indoors. A snug, stable pot is appropriate because the rhizome does not need a large volume of damp mix around it. When several new shoots have filled the pot or the container begins to deform, move it into a slightly larger pot with fresh, open substrate.
Care for light grey-green foliage
- Light: In bright indirect light, leaves stay firm and the grey-green colour remains clear. In dimmer rooms, growth slows and the pot dries more gradually.
- Watering: Water after the mix has dried deeply. Soak evenly, drain fully and let the lower pot dry again before repeating.
- Substrate: A free-draining mix with pumice, lava rock, coarse sand or fine bark keeps the rhizome aerated after watering.
- Pot choice: Choose a pot with drainage holes and enough weight to balance the leaves. Empty decorative cover pots after watering.
- Temperature: Keep it in steady indoor warmth, ideally around 18–27 °C. The root zone should stay warm after watering.
- Humidity: Average household humidity is enough. Normal room air is adequate for this cultivar.
- Feeding: Feed lightly during active growth with a diluted balanced or cactus fertiliser. Slow rhizome-based growth needs modest nutrition.
- Repotting: Repot when the plant has filled the container or the substrate has lost structure. Increase pot size carefully so the new mix dries predictably.
- Propagation: Divide rooted clumps to keep the light cultivar look consistent. Leaf cuttings can root and may produce growth that does not match the parent plant.
Marks and stress on light leaves
- Soft bases: Inspect the substrate line, rhizome area and cover pot. Soft tissue near the base usually means the lower plant stayed wet too long.
- Wrinkled leaves: Check the root system as well as dryness. Root damage can make leaves wrinkle even when the pot has been watered.
- Brown tips or edges: Review watering consistency, mineral buildup, old knocks and temperature dips. Trim only dry tissue if needed.
- Marked foliage: Wipe leaves gently with a soft damp cloth. The light surface shows dust and water spots quickly.
- Weak new growth: Move the plant closer to bright filtered light and check that the pot size matches the root system.
Placement around pets
Keep Dracaena trifasciata 'Moonshine' away from pets and small children who may chew the leaves. Snake plants contain saponins, which can cause nausea, vomiting or diarrhoea in cats and dogs if ingested. A raised, stable position also helps keep the light leaves free from knocks and bite marks.
The name behind Dracaena trifasciata
The accepted botanical name for the species is Dracaena trifasciata, while Sansevieria trifasciata remains the older name still widely used in houseplant retail and care information. The genus name Dracaena comes from the Greek drakaina, meaning “female dragon”, historically linked to red resin in some dragon tree relatives. The species epithet trifasciata means “three-banded” or “marked with three bands”, referring to the banded foliage pattern associated with the species.
Dracaena trifasciata 'Moonshine' has soft grey-green leaves, faint markings and slow basal growth in an upright clump.
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.2 ★★★★★
Based on 24 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 5
Thoughtful and deeply insightful
Format: Kindle
Browse not only goes over the current state of the US military in detail, but also ends with concrete and manageable suggestions to fix the major problems. Really good book.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on October 19, 2025
★★★★★ 5
Eye Opening, Thought Provoking and Scary
Format: Hardcover
This book will grab your attention, keep you spell bound and scare the heck out of you. The author was the Chief of Staff under Senator McCain for the Senate Armed Services Committee. This book is about new technology in the defense field and our inability to deal with it.
The new technology comes in many forms. There now are missiles that fly 2 or 3 times faster than what is available now. The missiles can reach out many many thousands of miles more, enough to hit America from the other side of the world. Now computers are recently coming out on the market which are smaller and 2 or 3 times faster than previous computers. All of that combines to radically speed up the decision time for war operations. The author calls it the kill chain.
The change doesn't stop there. The tactics used by our competitors has radically changed warfare. The examples the author uses comes from Russia. He reviews their invasion of "Little Green Men" in the Ukraine turned warfare upside down. They infiltrated troops into the land. Then they merged with dissent forces already in the country. Then the war stars, but on a small scale. Before you know it Russia grabbed Crimea and neutralized a huge slice of the Ukraine. That was the first time since WWII where borders changed.
The last part of the book is the most scary. He relies on his experience in Congress. He cites several examples to show where the bureaucracy is incapable of change. The pressures of on going operations, turf wars, political desires to protect home based companies all have immobilized the bureaucracy. He also cites the case of the Army trying to get a new side arm. It took 17 million to test an off the shelf pistol. The case showed how fear of risk has layered on level after level of control and check. Those levels of course adds costs. That was just one weapons program. Can you imagine what the cost is as you expand that out to really big ticket things like carriers. It leads to the Pentagon to continue buying weapons it doesn't need and use tactics which really come out of WWII. As the Pentagon games go on the world's armies change. I think his point about the bureaucracy caught in a never ending loop also might explain other troubles across the globe.
That leads to the scary part. Is the country ready for the future? Will it defend the nation for the future? If it isn't 9/11 might be a match strike in comparison.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on June 11, 2020
★★★★★ 4
Eyes Wide Open (with a few omissions)
Format: Audiobook
Thought provoking and great insights but with a few material omissions.
As others have noted this is an extremely thought provoking book. Perhaps the most disturbing is the discussion of war gaming a war with China and in most every Chinese initiated war China wins. A close runner-up was the lack of widespread commitment of other senate members to be as fully informed as possible on the military side of military affairs including budgets for specific projects.
It's hard to document the claim that two issues were serious omissions but I think there were.
There are seemingly minor details that are important Robert McNamara worked for Ford not GM. This is important for decisions at Ford by McNamara's accolates took Ford down to one of its smallest market share of the postwar years. McNamara gave Ford the Falcon , his successors brought out the Mustang. His arrogance cost billions and thousands of lives.
McCain recognized the political folly of the initial "leased" Boeing Replacement Tanker Program but that is not discussed. Neither is the continuing debacle of the program, felony convictions/pleas of top Boeing execs and the Pentagon's civilian chief of procurement all associated with the ill-fated tanker program. Declared a near emergency need at the turn of the century, twenty later the tankers can not perform the mission and tens of billions over budget.
To put the Tanker Program debacle in perspective, In July 1962 the US achieved its first orbital space flight and its first Moon landing 7 years later. In contrast the replacement tanker program has been in process Boeing was awarded the contract in 2002 , 19 years later and the tankers are not fully operational. Along the way both Boeing and a top civilian dod official did some hard time on felony corruption convictions/pleas.
The author notes that in the event of an outbreak of war between the US and China the US ships must get far offshore to have even a chance of survival, well beyond the range of existing carrier based aircraft to attack Chinese forces. The lack of tankers, short range attack aircraft and light loads prevents the Navy from going deep inland.
Part of the problem is that the Navy was induced to scrap the long range, extremely deadly F-14B and F-14X and replace them with the slower, shorter range , less carrying capacity F-18s (also made by Boeing) . The Navy had available at the time the F-14X upgrade program which would have converted the F-14 to an even more deadly fighter / bomber and equipped them with a follow-on to the Phoenix missiles, so badly needed to defend the fleet against airborne launched cruise missiles. In addition there were further upgrades in the works to give the Phoenix missiles extremely valuable capabilities. A further indication of the suspicious pattern is that DOD required that all F-14 tooling and parts be destroyed. The claim was made that the F-14s were maintenance hogs. Partly true but largely fixed with the F-14X digital conversion and new engines. While the maintenance hours per flight hour were problematical, when looked at in the big picture they were a rounding error in the 6,000 or so sailors in the Battle Group working 10-15 hour days and the thousands onshore supporting the effort.
Does this matter, well yesterday the Chinese ran a practice attack on a US carrier as about 15 aircraft approached within 250 nautical miles of the carrier. Most certainly within range to launch enough hypersonic cruise missiles to virtually assure the carrier would be taken out of action or sent to the bottom of the ocean. As the author notes today's strategy requires that the carriers flee the area and standoff about 1,000 miles. Faster, much longer range F-14x aircraft with the next generation Phoenix would significantly reduce this threat. They would also do the same against large Russian aircraft carrying many cruise missiles.
The F-35s will help overcome this deficiency but until they are fully operational and our Naval tanker capabilities redeveloped US capabilities are seriously compromised.
The author makes many great observations regarding deficiencies in procurement management, in the Pentagon , Congress and White House.
Examples discussed include the Army's failed attempt to acquire a new pistol. The 500 page request for proposals and flawed competition would be a joke were in not for the fact that the taxpayers precious dollars were wasted in the failed effort.
An illustration of how perverted the situation has become was illustrated today with a note the the US Air Force had issued an RFP for a "modesty curtain" to be installed on our ancient B-52's because there were now female personnel flying missions. This is a need that should be solvable by a few individuals over a bottle of wine who would probably come up with better ideas, reviewed by an engineer on Monday and perhaps fabricated in one of the base shops.
As others have noted it was USAF Col John Boyd who revolutionized the air to air combat, was shunned by top Brass while at the Pentagon and left to his own devices prepared his famous day long lecture on Winning and Loosing Wars that in turn helped rewrite the USMC land battle doctrine. Most all of this work done out of sight of his "leaders" .
The author might have also given credit to leaders like Admiral Tom Connolly who sacrificed his career to save Naval aviation from the terminally flawed F-111B as an example of the character and courage needed in the Pentagon, Congress and the White House today and into the future.
The author's descriptions of the challenges posed by an aggressive and expansive China should be taken to heart by every American. Unless we stop treating military procurement as a Chicago like spoils system and manage both what we buy and what we pay for it we are inviting Chinese military challenges and placing an even greater financial millstone around the necks of American taxpayers and their future generations.
Overall , not perfect but a very important must read
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 30, 2021
★★★★★ 5
Add this to every DoD Reading List!
Format: Kindle
There were so many great excerpts throughout the book that my highlights filled 16 pages in MS Word. This is a must read for all Pentagon personnel, those in operational commands, the acquisition community, and defense industry. Chris' insights as McCain's advisor were invaluable to understand the nuances and competing incentives of the DoD, industry, and Congressional perspectives.
"The problem is that America is playing a losing game. Over many decades we have built our military around small numbers of large, expensive, exquisite, heavily manned, and hard to replace platforms that struggle to close the kill chain as one battle network. China, meanwhile, has built large numbers of multi million dollar weapons to find and attack America’s small numbers of exponentially more expensive military platforms."
"It requires a sweeping redesign of the American military: from a military built around small numbers of large, expensive, exquisite, heavily manned, and hard to replace platforms to a military built around large numbers of smaller, lower cost, expendable, and highly autonomous machines."
"New technologies alone will not save us. We need new thinking — an ambitious effort to reimagine the ends, ways, and means of US military power, as well as the role of our allies in this effort — to succeed in a future world where America’s military superiority will likely erode further if China’s military technological development continues."
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 9, 2020
★★★★★ 5
The Real Arms Race
Format: Kindle
I am a life-long Democrat, supposed to bristle at the very idea of military spending. Brose's book convinced me the problem is not how much we spend, but what we're spending it on. "Kill chain" is military-speak for the three phases of combat -- figuring out what's going on, deciding what to do about it, and taking effective action. Brose spells out how technology changed all three phases while the Defense Department and its minders in Congress weren't paying attention. The result has been to significantly undermine our military preparedness and, more importantly, the ultimate goal of deterrence. For all the money we're spending, Brose shows how it's mostly on the wrong things, i.e., large, expensive platforms that are only incremental improvements over prior systems designed for different times. He shows how the military-industrial complex, abetted by a Congress invested in the status quo, is arming our military with technology inferior to what you'd find in a modern automobile. The development of the Internet may have been kick-started by the defense department back in the 1960s, but the information revolution that followed largely left the U.S. military behind. Meanwhile, potential adversaries are compensating for relatively lower defense budgets by exploiting emerging technologies that could change the character of war, raising multiple ethical, geo-political, and governance issues. The Kill Chain is compelling, scary, and must-reading for our political leaders and all intelligent voters.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 28, 2020